Bug 263686 - Some plugins don't have source
Summary: Some plugins don't have source
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: CDT
Classification: Tools
Component: cdt-releng (show other bugs)
Version: 6.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: cdt-releng-inbox@eclipse.org CLA
QA Contact: Jonah Graham CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-02-04 14:58 EST by James Blackburn CLA
Modified: 2020-09-04 15:23 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description James Blackburn CLA 2009-02-04 14:58:58 EST 
Build ID: HEAD

Steps To Reproduce:
I can't find the source for the following plugins in the 6.0M5 pre-release. It's possible I'm missing something...

org.eclipse.cdt.core.tests
org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui.tests 
org.eclipse.cdt.examples.dsf
org.eclipse.cdt.examples.dsf.pda
org.eclipse.cdt.examples.dsf.pda.ui
org.eclipse.cdt.debug.gdbjtag.*
Comment 1 Vivian Kong CLA 2009-02-04 15:10:43 EST 
We currently don't have source plugins for all CDT plugins, only those in the following features have source (which resides in the SDK features):

org.eclipse.cdt.core.lrparser
org.eclipse.cdt.core.parser.upc
org.eclipse.cdt.platform
org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.build
org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.debug
org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.dsf
org.eclipse.cdt.xlc

I can create source plugins for the remaining ones if you'd like.  Let me know.
Comment 2 James Blackburn CLA 2009-02-04 15:24:27 EST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> I can create source plugins for the remaining ones if you'd like.  Let me know.

Not urgent by any means, just thought I'd bugzilla the discrepancies I found. Was hoping to run the tests as distributed with the build, though without source it's not so easy to imort-and-run.  

If the build test logs are to believed, it looks ok from my POV :)
Comment 3 Vivian Kong CLA 2009-02-04 15:33:51 EST 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Not urgent by any means, just thought I'd bugzilla the discrepancies I found.
> Was hoping to run the tests as distributed with the build, though without
> source it's not so easy to imort-and-run.  

I'll put this on my TODO list.


> If the build test logs are to believed, it looks ok from my POV :)

Is that a 'go' for M5 then?  If you don't mind can you please reply to the cdt-dev list.  Thanks James!