Bug 262586 - [Launcher] Cannot launch from below "\\myhost\My %@!# Folder"
Summary: [Launcher] Cannot launch from below "\\myhost\My %@!# Folder"
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 3109
Alias: None
Product: Equinox
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Framework (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: equinox.framework-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-27 11:20 EST by Martin Oberhuber CLA
Modified: 2009-01-27 11:59 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Screenshot of error dialog (8.81 KB, image/gif)
2009-01-27 11:20 EST, Martin Oberhuber CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Oberhuber CLA 2009-01-27 11:20:41 EST
Created attachment 123890 [details]
Screenshot of error dialog

Build ID: I20090127-0100

Based on the UNC testcases from
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/UNC_Paths

I extracted eclipse-SDK-I20090127-0100-win32.zip into
   D:\PDE\I20090127-0100
and shared folder D:\PDE as
   \\szg-mober-l1\My %@!# Folder
I then used Windows Explorer to navigate into
   \\szg-mober-l1\My %@!# Folder\I20090127-0100\eclipse
and dbl clicked on eclipse.exe

As a result, I saw the splashscreen for a while, but then (before showing the workspace picker), it terminated with attached dialog (JVM terminated. exit code 13).

The installation is unchanged compared to the vanilla extraction from the ZIP, so I'm assuming that p2 didn't have a chance to initialize anything yet.
Comment 1 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2009-01-27 11:42:29 EST
These also fail:
   \\szg-mober-l1\My % Folder\I20090127-0100\eclipse
   \\szg-mober-l1\My # Folder\I20090127-0100\eclipse

These work, until the Workspace picker at least:
   \\szg-mober-l1\My ! Folder\I20090127-0100\eclipse
   \\szg-mober-l1\My @ Folder\I20090127-0100\eclipse
   \\szg-mober-l1\My @! Folder\I20090127-0100\eclipse
Comment 2 John Arthorne CLA 2009-01-27 11:46:11 EST
I think this is a duplicate of bug 3109.
Comment 3 Thomas Watson CLA 2009-01-27 11:58:49 EST
Yes, dup of bug 3109.
Comment 4 Thomas Watson CLA 2009-01-27 11:59:18 EST
really marking as dup this time!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3109 ***