Bug 259096 - [unittestsupport]: The JMUnit tags created inside test suite do not work after code formatting
Summary: [unittestsupport]: The JMUnit tags created inside test suite do not work aft...
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: MTJ (Archived)
Classification: Tools
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 0.9.1   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 0.9.1   Edit
Assignee: Diego Madruga Sandin CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: contributed, ui
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-12-17 08:42 EST by David Marques CLA
Modified: 2008-12-30 14:24 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Patch with bug resolution (6.86 KB, patch)
2008-12-19 09:46 EST, David Marques CLA 		wds057: iplog+
wds057: review+
Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Marques CLA 2008-12-17 08:42:58 EST 
Overview: The JMUnit creates tags inside the setupSuite method for update purposes, if the code formatter changes the //JMUnit-BEGIN format it does not work anymore.

Steps to Reproduce:

    1) Create a test suite
    2) Format the code making sure the //JMUnit-BEGIN format changes as for example // JMUnit-BEGIN.
    3) Try to update test suite

Actual Results: 
    After selecting update test suite nothing happens.

Expected Results:
    Update test suite wizard should be displayed.

Build Date & Platform:
 
 Installation : eclipse-SDK-3.4.0 (I20080617-2000) 
 MTJ install  : Runtime | SDK | Examples
 java.runtime : Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b06)
 os.name:     : Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 3

Additional Builds and Platforms:

Additional Information:
Comment 1 David Marques CLA 2008-12-19 09:46:39 EST 
Created attachment 120945 [details]
Patch with bug resolution

Hello everyone,

I am sending an attachment with this issue resolution. Can anyone please revise it ?

[],

David Marques
Comment 2 Diego Madruga Sandin CLA 2008-12-19 12:08:47 EST 
I have revised the patch. The code was committed to SVN.
Comment 3 Gustavo de Paula CLA 2008-12-30 14:24:56 EST 
bug released into 0.9.1