Comment 1 Simon Mc Duff 2008-09-18 07:39:16 EDT

It will be hard to replace PersistentContent since it derived from CDOStoreEList<Object>. Isn't 

Comment 2 Eike Stepper 2008-09-18 07:50:37 EDT

Of course!

Comment 3 Simon Mc Duff 2008-11-01 11:55:48 EDT

Committed to HEAD 
Included when fixing problem:
251544: Instance of list are not the same for the following transition transient/new persisted/transient resulting strange behavior (NPE)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=251544

Comment 4 Eike Stepper 2008-11-04 17:02:47 EST

Fix available in CDO 2.0.0 I200811041537

Comment 5 Eike Stepper 2009-01-06 06:13:29 EST

Hi Simon,

I tried to evaluate Ed's patch. While it was looking good, I had the feeling that we don't need it anymore (due to refactoring of CDOObjectImpl and CDOResourceImpl). When you have time could you please clarify this?

Comment 6 Simon Mc Duff 2009-01-06 08:14:29 EST

(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi Simon,
> 
> I tried to evaluate Ed's patch. While it was looking good, I had the feeling
> that we don't need it anymore (due to refactoring of CDOObjectImpl and
> CDOResourceImpl). When you have time could you please clarify this?
> 

Your feeling is right.

Since we do not distinguish between Transient and persistent anymore we will not be able to use it. Our ContentsCDOList class extends BasicEStoreEList, I don't see how it will be possible to use it.


Simon

Comment 7 Eike Stepper 2009-06-27 11:53:08 EDT

Generally available.