Bug 247509 - Migrate API tools framework to support binary and source analysis
Summary: Migrate API tools framework to support binary and source analysis
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: PDE
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: API Tools (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: PDE API Tools Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords: performance
Depends on:
Blocks: 230277 231936
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-09-16 11:11 EDT by Michael Rennie CLA
Modified: 2019-09-09 02:23 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Rennie CLA 2008-09-16 11:11:06 EDT
In an effort to improve the overall performance of API tools and expand its functionality we need to re-architect the way we handle API descriptions and profiles, as well as homogenize our descriptor framework.

From the 3.5 plan:

* Migrate architecture to support binary or source analysis - Currently, API
tools only analyzes binaries. As we move to support source analysis we will
leverage the bounded Java model element cache. We will use a similar caching
strategy for analysis in a non-OSGi/non-workspace environment (i.e.
releng-build).
Comment 1 Tristan de Inés CLA 2010-05-18 05:04:23 EDT
This is related to my enhancement request
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=312426
Comment 2 Darin Wright CLA 2010-05-18 08:59:19 EDT
This enhancement request is about the actual information being analyzed - i.e. the ability to analyze .java files vs. class files (it's not about source vs. binary compatibility issues).
Comment 3 Tristan de Inés CLA 2010-05-19 04:41:36 EDT
Ah, now I fully understand. In that case there is no direct relation, sorry. Except that implementing source analysis might make it possible to fully implement source compatibility analysis, and that might be a good time to differentiate between compatibility problem types.
Comment 4 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 15:32:08 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Comment 5 Julian Honnen CLA 2019-09-09 02:23:30 EDT
Please remove the stalebug flag, if this issue is still relevant and can be reproduced on the latest release.