Community
Participate
Working Groups
There seem to be problems currently with the inherited perclause setting from an abstract aspect. It has been reported that if there are no pointcuts in the abstract aspect it affects how the perclause is interpreted (ie. a pertypewithin() setting is ignored). I'm writing some tests around this. The enhancement is to cover how to specify a perclause for the sub aspect created in aop.xml. Probably just a new field to be set on the concrete-aspect specification.
unsetting the target field which is currently set for something already released