Bug 246703 - Develop EFS provider
Summary: Develop EFS provider
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: EMF
Classification: Modeling
Component: cdo.core (show other bugs)
Version: 4.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: Appealing to a Broader Community
Keywords: helpwanted
: 324532 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 249847
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-09-09 08:07 EDT by Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera CLA
Modified: 2012-12-31 01:58 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
stepper: galileo-

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera CLA 2008-09-09 08:07:59 EDT 
It would be interesting to provide the required implementation to manage a CDO  repository as an Eclipse File System.

We need to look into the viability of the enhancement proposal, which could include a possible refactoring of CDO architecture to consider CDO repositories look like a typical file system, with folders/subfolders (CDOFolder) and files (CDOResources).

Cheers,
Adolfo.
Comment 1 Eike Stepper CLA 2008-12-02 15:29:32 EST 
Adolfo,

Now that we implemented bug #249847 (Store resources in a hierarchical structure) an EFS provider could become easier to implement. What do you think? Are you still working on this issue?
Comment 2 Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera CLA 2008-12-03 04:43:05 EST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Adolfo,
> 
> Now that we implemented bug #249847 (Store resources in a hierarchical
> structure) an EFS provider could become easier to implement. What do you think?
> Are you still working on this issue?
> 

At least a more consistent implementation without too many UnsuportedOperationExceptions :D. I love having that structure ;).

I'm afraid that I won't be able to work on this issue during this month. However, I have plans to work on it later or sooner, maybe in January ;).

Cheers!!
Comment 3 Eike Stepper CLA 2009-11-01 06:00:22 EST 
Rebasing all unresolved enhancement requests to 3.0
Comment 4 Eike Stepper CLA 2010-06-29 04:51:19 EDT 
Rebasing all outstanding enhancements requests to version 4.0
Comment 5 Eike Stepper CLA 2011-06-23 03:59:09 EDT 
Moving all open enhancement requests to 4.1
Comment 6 Eike Stepper CLA 2012-03-01 03:17:01 EST 
*** Bug 324532 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Eike Stepper CLA 2012-08-14 22:57:52 EDT 
Moving all open issues to 4.2. Open bugs can be ported to 4.1 maintenance after they've been fixed in master.
Comment 8 Eike Stepper CLA 2012-12-31 01:58:02 EST 
No activity here for years.