Bug 236073 - Simple cheat sheet editor enhancements
Summary: Simple cheat sheet editor enhancements
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: PDE
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: PDE-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords: bugday
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-06 11:55 EDT by Jason Woods CLA
Modified: 2019-09-09 02:27 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jason Woods CLA 2008-06-06 11:55:11 EDT 
The simple cheat sheet editor does not support all of the content options the cheat sheet xml schema supports.  Ultimately, it should support all possible cheat sheet content options, but since that is unlikely to happen in the short term, I would like to request that support be added for the following as a first step:

1.  The "returns" property of a command
2.  The "confirm" property of a command
3.  The "required" property of a command
4.  The "dialog" property of an item
5.  The "onCompletion" element
Comment 1 Chris Goldthorpe CLA 2008-06-12 17:49:01 EDT 
Reassigning to PDE
Comment 2 Chris Aniszczyk CLA 2008-06-13 10:38:42 EDT 
seems like a great thing to work on in 3.5 as I'm refactoring out the UA editors in PDE into separate plug-ins.... prime for someone to take over ownership of them ;)
Comment 3 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:16:52 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Comment 4 Julian Honnen CLA 2019-09-09 02:27:28 EDT 
Please remove the stalebug flag, if this issue is still relevant and can be reproduced on the latest release.