Bug 229667 - Add binding recovery for member value pair bindings.
Summary: Add binding recovery for member value pair bindings.
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Core-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-30 12:40 EDT by Olivier Thomann CLA
Modified: 2023-11-15 09:43 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Olivier Thomann CLA 2008-04-30 12:40:17 EDT 
See bug 229615 and bug 228651, they show what is the current behavior for member value pairs in case of binding recovery.
To add this a new type RecoveredMethodBinding should be added to handle the missing method bindings in case the pair cannot be resolved.

This should be investigated post 3.4.
Comment 1 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2009-04-28 11:28:31 EDT 
Not for 3.5
Comment 2 Eclipse Genie CLA 2019-12-03 06:51:52 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 3 Stephan Herrmann CLA 2019-12-04 05:16:41 EST 
Inspecting the code this area seems to be unchanged since 2008. I seem to recall a fairly recent question (forum?, SO?) that could possibly relate to this, so, yes, improved binding recovery will likely help some users.
Comment 4 Eclipse Genie CLA 2021-11-24 12:51:06 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 5 Eclipse Genie CLA 2023-11-15 09:43:31 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.