Bug 21952 - Circular Dependencies Message - Error vs. Warning Message
Summary: Circular Dependencies Message - Error vs. Warning Message
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 23318
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 2.0.2   Edit
Assignee: Philipe Mulet CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-07-26 10:19 EDT by Jim Thorpe CLA
Modified: 2002-09-12 10:03 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jim Thorpe CLA 2002-07-26 10:19:28 EDT
Circular dependency error msg should be a warning msg if preference is not 
checked

1) Go to the preference settings and locate the "java compiler" preferences.
2) There is a tab labeled "other" which has a checkbox "Stop building when
an invalid classpath is detected." 

If this checkbox is not checked, projects will attempt to build/compile even
with a circular dependency.  

   However, the message "A cycle was detected in the projects classpath" 
is showing up in the task list as an error message (red X).  We feel it should 
really be a
warning message in this case.  There is no way to remove this message from 
the task list (short of removing the circular dependency itself).

We have circular dependencies that we can't get rid of.  Having a error 
message (red X) show up that we can never remove is undesirable. 

One further comment about circular dependencies:  We're looking at what we can 
do to resolve them but it is not something that can be resolved quickly.  We 
have numerous (20+)  EJB projects containing numerous (Can't remember how many) 
EJBs.
Comment 1 Philipe Mulet CLA 2002-07-26 13:00:40 EDT
This would make sense. Need to see how we would re-compute these markers when 
the setting change, but this would definitely make sense.
Comment 2 Jim Thorpe CLA 2002-08-08 06:33:43 EDT
Is there any new news on this problem and how soon it could be resolved?
Comment 3 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2002-09-12 10:03:13 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23318 ***