Bug 21843 - Qualifier in "Type Hierarchy" View
Summary: Qualifier in "Type Hierarchy" View
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 2.1 M1   Edit
Assignee: Jerome Lanneluc CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-07-24 05:08 EDT by Philippe Krief CLA
Modified: 2002-09-10 08:51 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Philippe Krief CLA 2002-07-24 05:08:20 EDT
Hi,
In my current workspace I have the code that I develop and a zip file
containin my latest drop.
When I open a Hierarchy on a Class, Eclipse asks me to pickup a "Qualifier"
when it is necessary. In my case, it lets me choose between my class stored
in my project and the class stored in the .zip file.
Once I have selected the class store in the project, if I double click on
one of its superclasses or subclasses, it systematically shows the source
from the zip file...
Can somebody tell me how to get rid of that?
Thanks for your help
Philippe
Comment 1 Dirk Baeumer CLA 2002-07-26 10:44:54 EDT
The type hierarchy is managed by JCore. Philippe does this depend on how the 
build path is setup (e.g jar before or after project in build path order) ?
Comment 2 Philippe Krief CLA 2002-07-26 11:06:37 EDT
No, it doesn't. I can't have any reference to this jar in my classpath because 
I'm working presently on its source. So, some projects reference the latest 
built jar but my current code references the projects containing the source 
code.

Actually I even try to reorganize the Build Order in preferences. I still get 
the same result!
Philippe
Comment 3 Philipe Mulet CLA 2002-07-26 12:57:53 EDT
Sounds like a bug, in case multiple versions of the same guy coexist.

Need to investigate.
Comment 4 Philipe Mulet CLA 2002-07-26 12:58:36 EDT
Maybe for the short term, you can work-around the problem by using working sets 
to restrain the range of investigation.
Comment 5 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2002-08-27 05:58:05 EDT
This works for me in 2.0.1. Philippe K what build are you using?
Comment 6 Philippe Krief CLA 2002-09-01 12:55:33 EDT
I was using 2.0.0 with WSDD...
I will check with the newest one and will let you know.
Thanks

Philippe
Comment 7 Philippe Krief CLA 2002-09-02 12:25:18 EDT
I moved to 2.0.1 and it works great now.

Thanks

Philippe
Comment 8 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2002-09-03 06:58:47 EDT
Good to know.
Closing.