Community
Participate
Working Groups
I would appreciate code assistant to filter by substring containment instead of prefix match. This feature is present in ms visual studio and makes easier navigation over classes and to reference one. To retain in favor, current prefix matching would be an alternative(or default). Thanks for response, Tomas Studva
Are you suggesting that the following would propose myfoo() ? public class X { void myfoo() { } void bar() { foo<|> // ctrl+space here } }
(In reply to comment #1) > Are you suggesting that the following would propose myfoo() ? > > public class X { > > void myfoo() { > } > > void bar() { > foo<|> // ctrl+space here > } > } > Yes, it would propose myfoo(), but the power is mainly in proposal to class names, for example: void foo(){ OutputS<|> // ctrl+space here } would propose not only OutputStream, but also FileOutputStream. What do you think? Very important is good ordering of proposals.
Yes, this sounds interesting.
The idea is interesting, but it should not be activated by default to prevent the disruption of existing behavior. So it should be optional.
There is a completion engine called "subwords completion" that does so. Please visit [1] for details. [1] https://www.eclipse.org/recommenders/manual/#completion-engines