Community
Participate
Working Groups
Build 3.3.0 In following code, observe that resilience on catch block variable is not as good as for standard local variable with unbound type. public class X { void bar() { try { Zork z = null; z.foo(); } catch(Zork z) { z.foo(); } } } The unbound exception type shouldn't block the variable from being declared, so that secondary errors are avoided.
Created attachment 73861 [details] Proposed patch
Released for 3.4M1. (was released for 3.4M1, but bug remained open - my fault)
Verified for 3.4M1 using build I20070809-0010.