Bug 195659 - java.lang.ClassCastException at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolveGenericWildcardFor(World.java:461)
Summary: java.lang.ClassCastException at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolveGenericWildca...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: AspectJ
Classification: Tools
Component: Compiler (show other bugs)
Version: DEVELOPMENT   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 1.6.0 RC1   Edit
Assignee: aspectj inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-07-06 10:20 EDT by chu rennan CLA
Modified: 2008-03-17 13:03 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description chu rennan CLA 2007-07-06 10:20:06 EDT 
sample：
public class ObjectArrayDataProvider<E>  {
	private Class<? extends E[]> newType;
	public ObjectArrayDataProvider(Class<? extends E[]> newType) {
		this.newType = newType;
	}	
}

error info：
java.lang.ClassCastException
at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolveGenericWildcardFor(World.java:461)
at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolveToReferenceType(World.java:372)
at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolve(World.java:271)
at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolve(World.java:191)
at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolve(World.java:223)
at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createParameterizedType(TypeFactory.java:47)
at org.aspectj.weaver.World.resolveTo ... :183)
at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:55)

Compile error: ClassCastException thrown: org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType$Array
Comment 1 Matt Chapman CLA 2007-07-06 11:21:01 EDT 
passing over to compiler
Comment 2 Peter CLA 2008-03-05 04:04:41 EST 
I have the same bug with AspectJ Tools 1.5.3.
If you write "passing over to compiler", where can I look for resolution?
Comment 3 Andrew Clement CLA 2008-03-05 18:33:38 EST 
It means the bug was reassigned to AspectJ from AJDT - any resolution information will still be in this bug report.
Comment 4 Andrew Clement CLA 2008-03-05 18:40:43 EST 
I initially thought this was because of the same reason as bug 167197 (that array is not a referencetype) but on attempting to compile the code supplied in the first comment here with AspectJ6 - it just works.
Comment 5 Andrew Clement CLA 2008-03-17 13:03:53 EDT 
playing around with this, I managed to get it to fail with a little aspect attached:

aspect X { before(): execution(new(Class<*>)) {}}

with the changes I have just put in under 167197 - this is fixed.  fixes should be available shortly.