Bug 177773 - External Plug-in references could be sorted
Summary: External Plug-in references could be sorted
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: PDE
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.3 M7   Edit
Assignee: PDE-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-16 11:22 EDT by DJ Houghton CLA
Modified: 2007-03-30 08:17 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description DJ Houghton CLA 2007-03-16 11:22:26 EDT
When you expand the External Plug-ins references for a bundle, the JAR files are listed in a seemingly random order. Perhaps its the order of the bundles that they are declared in. 

It would be helpful to the user if the JARs were listed alphabetically, independant of their bundles.
Comment 1 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-16 11:26:25 EDT
I believe they are already sorted by the ID of their originating plug-in, no?
Comment 2 DJ Houghton CLA 2007-03-16 11:49:44 EDT
Yes that's what it looks like but since there is no correlation between the name of the JAR and its bundle name, it makes it difficult to find JARs for non-JARd bundles.
Comment 3 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-16 11:52:51 EDT
An enhancement request like this one would be given a WONTFIX resolution status in the Platform/Resources inbox so fast... ;)
Comment 4 DJ Houghton CLA 2007-03-16 12:06:39 EDT
Yes but you PDE folk are infinitely more considerate than those Platform guys. ;-)
Comment 5 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-26 16:51:12 EDT
Fixed.  One ridiculous request down :)
Comment 6 DJ Houghton CLA 2007-03-26 16:59:17 EDT
Thanks Wassim. I know how you hate it when I enter these fluff bug reports. :-)
Comment 7 Jeff McAffer CLA 2007-03-29 17:55:33 EDT
Sorting by JAR names doesn't really make sense.  People know about bundles.  Should be sorted by bundle name.
Comment 8 John Arthorne CLA 2007-03-29 18:00:36 EDT
Wouldn't it make more sense to sort by install path??
Comment 9 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-29 18:01:37 EDT
sometimes I wish the runtime team would just go away :)
Comment 10 John Arthorne CLA 2007-03-29 18:02:39 EDT
Re comment #8 - DJ made me write that.
Comment 11 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-29 18:05:41 EDT
I know.  DJ is dead to me!!!  This threat used to work, but has lost its effect over the years...
Comment 12 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-29 21:27:33 EDT
closing minus one friendship ;)
Comment 13 Jeff McAffer CLA 2007-03-30 00:04:43 EDT
Wait!  Comment 7 was not that ridiculous!  The problem with the original case was not that they were sorted wrong but that the sorting was not obvious to people.  Sorting by bundle does seem to be the natural way (as indicated by the every perceptive PDE team choosing that approach in the first place ;-)  So perhaps what is needed is sort by bundle name and show the user the bundle name.
Comment 14 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-30 06:37:32 EDT
Prior to doing this enhancement, WE WERE SORTING BY BUNDLE SYMBOLIC NAME!!!
Comment 15 DJ Houghton CLA 2007-03-30 08:14:57 EDT
....which is kind of silly if you aren't showing the bundle symbolic names in the list. ;-)
Comment 16 Wassim Melhem CLA 2007-03-30 08:17:27 EDT
the label of the jar comes from JDT.  Let's move the bug there.  I am sure they will be very very accomodating to this very important request.