Community
Participate
Working Groups
Through out the code, it uses either "getAddressesPerColumn()" or "getBytesPerColumn() / fRendering.getAddressableSize()" to calculate the cell address. Cell addresses should not depend on addressable size. Currently, this does not cause any issue as CMemoryBlockExtension always return 1 as the addressable size. However, the code should use get getBytesPerColumn() to calculate cell addresses. The method getAddressesPerColumn() should be remove to avoid confusion.
Traditional Memory Rendering now lives in CDT -> moving bugs