Community
Participate
Working Groups
The current terminal implementation is about 60 times slower than for example rxvt (on cygwin) to show 3 MB of terminal input (http://artscene.textfiles.com/vt100/ to get all: http://artscene.textfiles.com/archives/vt100.zip). Here some performance numbers: rxvt (on cygwin) : 5.7 sec 550 kb/sec hyperterminal : 11.8 sec 265 kb/sec xterm (on cygwin) : 24.5 sec 127 kb/sec sshview : 40.3 sec 77 kb/sec terminal (in eclipse): 333.8 sec 10 kb/sec Remarks: - rxvt is a vt102 emulator -- it's supposed to be a xterm replacement: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rxvt - microsofts hyperterminal does not show anything at that speed. It shows the "result" at the end. - sshview is a swing based eclipse ssh based terminal emulator: http://sourceforge.net/projects/parsec/
This bug is for improvements on terminal read. See also bug 170814 for improving performance of terminal write.
I guess this can be declared fixed as per TM 2.0.1RC2 ? Michael can you add some information how much faster the Terminal has become, and other interesting stuff for adopters?
According to hearsay, terminal has become up to 1000 times faster on Windows. Does anybody have any concrete measurement?