Bug 1646 - Feature: Resolution failure notification (1GF9OG5)
Summary: Feature: Resolution failure notification (1GF9OG5)
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Debug (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P2 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Jared Burns CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-10-10 22:16 EDT by Jared Burns CLA
Modified: 2003-02-25 16:09 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jared Burns CLA 2001-10-10 22:16:52 EDT
When the display fails to resolve an expression, the client prints "<inspection target>: " as usual,
but it does not print a result to the display. Suggest printing "(failed to resolve)" the way 
"(no explicit return value)" is printed for declarations.

1. In the debugger display window, enter "int i=0;", highlight, and display. 
	Client prints "(no explicit return value)"
2. Type a nonexistant variable name, highlight, and display.
	Client currently prints nothing.

NOTES:

DW (6/13/01 11:36:46 AM)
	Defer.
Comment 1 Darin Wright CLA 2001-10-11 14:31:16 EDT
In the current code base, entering a non-resolvable name, results in
an error dialog with "X cannot be resolved".

Fixed.
Comment 2 Darin Wright CLA 2001-10-11 14:31:39 EDT
Please verify.
Comment 3 Jared Burns CLA 2001-10-17 14:03:48 EDT
Verified that the dialog pops up.

We should still print out "(failed to evaluate)" in the display view. Not doing
so breaks the formatting. For instance:

Enter three queries on the string grah (grah.toString, grah.asdf, grah.toString)
yields:

grah.toString()
	(java.lang.String) "grah"
grah.asdf
	grah.toString()
	(java.lang.String) "grah"
grah.foo()
	(no explicit return value)

If we print an error message, it would (should) look like:

grah.toString()
	(java.lang.String) "grah"
grah.asdf
	(evaluation failed)
grah.toString()
	(java.lang.String) "grah"
foo()
	(no explicit return value)
Comment 4 DJ Houghton CLA 2001-10-24 06:37:18 EDT
Feature Request
VERSION: 122++

Comment 5 Darin Swanson CLA 2001-11-06 10:31:30 EST
Added "(evaluation failed)" on failure.
Please verify.
Comment 6 Jared Burns CLA 2001-11-12 12:17:40 EST
Verified.
Comment 7 Jared Burns CLA 2002-10-23 16:19:15 EDT
This is a test of Bugzilla/Opera. This is a test of Bugzilla/Opera. This is a test of Bugzilla/Opera. This is a test of Bugzilla/Opera. 
Comment 8 Jared Burns CLA 2003-02-25 16:09:42 EST
This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test. This is a test.