Bug 157407 - [API Request] Add some sort of support API (hooks?) in html editor to support custom tags in html
Summary: [API Request] Add some sort of support API (hooks?) in html editor to support...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: WTP Source Editing
Classification: WebTools
Component: wst.html (show other bugs)
Version: 1.5   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement with 14 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: Future   Edit
Assignee: Nick Sandonato CLA
QA Contact: Nick Sandonato CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: helpwanted
: 115467 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-14 20:23 EDT by Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf CLA
Modified: 2011-09-21 13:19 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf CLA 2006-09-14 20:23:00 EDT 
Some plug-in projects that make use of your html editor like WOLips http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Home (an eclipse plug in for WebObjects http://www.apple.com/webobjects/ ) would greatly benefit from some form of API support for custom tags in html, in this case support for tags like <webobject name="someName">, </webobject> and <webobject name="someName" /> would be needed. Other projects like http://spindle.sourceforge.net/ (an eclipse plug in for tapestry http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/ ) would also profit from support for custom attributes in standard html tags like this <tr jwcid="@Foreach" source="ognl:dvds" value="ognl:dvd" element="tr">. I think some sort of hooks would do it, since I am just a user of those plug-ins I have no Idea if that would be sufficient for the purpose, at best you get in contact with the respective developers (URLs above)

regards, Lars
Comment 1 Amy Wu CLA 2007-03-08 18:46:17 EST 
*** Bug 115467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Amy Wu CLA 2007-03-08 18:47:36 EST 
FYI, there is sample code in duplicate bug 115467
Comment 3 Nitin Dahyabhai CLA 2007-09-13 04:48:37 EDT 
This is a great idea, but we don't have people to work on this just now.  There is still a chance it would fit in for 3.0, but we would accept high quality patches, regardless.