Bug 149096 - NoSuchFieldError when using cflow with XML concrete aspect
Summary: NoSuchFieldError when using cflow with XML concrete aspect
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 132080
Alias: None
Product: AspectJ
Classification: Tools
Component: LTWeaving (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 major (vote)
Target Milestone: 1.5.3   Edit
Assignee: aspectj inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-28 19:27 EDT by Steve Park CLA
Modified: 2006-09-25 07:45 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Test case containing simple code that duplicates the bug (1.23 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-06-28 19:29 EDT, Steve Park CLA 		no flags Details
Patch to the junit test cases adding the test case for the bug (4.37 KB, patch)
2006-06-30 13:10 EDT, Steve Park CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steve Park CLA 2006-06-28 19:27:39 EDT 
When attempting to perform load time weaving of a concrete aspect defined in an aop.xml file, I get the following stack trace:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: ajc$cflowCounter$0
        at TestMain.main(TestMain.aj:8)

The concrete aspect extends an abstract aspect that defines a cflow pointcut.
Comment 1 Steve Park CLA 2006-06-28 19:29:50 EDT 
Created attachment 45512 [details]
Test case containing simple code that duplicates the bug

Attaching simple source code that demonstrates the bug
Comment 2 Steve Park CLA 2006-06-30 13:10:01 EDT 
Created attachment 45606 [details]
Patch to the junit test cases adding the test case for the bug
Comment 3 Andrew Clement CLA 2006-07-03 10:57:22 EDT 
I think this is the same as bug 132080.  It occurs because LTW concrete-aspect definitions are not exposed to the weaver.  If they aren't exposed, they don't get the necessary cflow field.  (there are no doubt a large family of errors in this area...)
Comment 4 Ron Bodkin CLA 2006-07-03 13:24:35 EDT 
It makes sense that this would be the same bug as 132080, although I suspect that not supporting advising cflow pointcuts in concrete aspects is a more serious limitation for many users than other forms of not weaving concrete aspects.
Comment 5 Andrew Clement CLA 2006-07-03 14:35:33 EDT 
i agree
Comment 6 Matthew Webster CLA 2006-09-25 06:22:34 EDT 
Marking as duplicate give the solution, if it works, will be the same.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 132080 ***