Bug 145500 - [hierarchy] Superclass could be more resilient
Summary: [hierarchy] Superclass could be more resilient
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2.1   Edit
Assignee: Philipe Mulet CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-06 05:47 EDT by Philipe Mulet CLA
Modified: 2006-09-12 03:43 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Proposed patch (1.11 KB, patch)
2006-06-06 05:49 EDT, Philipe Mulet CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-06-06 05:47:00 EDT 
Build 3.2RC7

When a class is missing its binary superclass, a subclass may lose the fact it is still a supertype (though its hierarchy is broken from there up).

Similar example to bug 144976 (GKServlet should still be shown in hierarchy, even if missing HttpServlet superclass)
@see TypeHierarchyTests#testResilienceToMissingBinaries()
Comment 1 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-06-06 05:49:32 EDT 
Created attachment 43576 [details]
Proposed patch
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-06-06 09:22:45 EDT 
TypeHierarchyTests#testSuperTypeHierarchyWithMissingBinary()
also exhibits the unoptimal behavior
Comment 3 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-06-06 10:20:20 EDT 
Released along with fix for bug 144976 in 3.2.1
Comment 4 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-06-07 05:52:25 EDT 
Jerome - pls verify
Comment 5 Frederic Fusier CLA 2006-06-12 06:18:47 EDT 
Released for 3.2.1
Released for 3.3 M1 while merging TARGET_321 in HEAD
Comment 6 Frederic Fusier CLA 2006-08-08 07:35:33 EDT 
Verified for 3.3 M1 using build I20060807-2000 (code reveiw).
Comment 7 David Audel CLA 2006-09-12 03:43:31 EDT 
Verified for 3.2.1 using build M20060908-1655