Bug 144248 - [batch] Progressive help text
Summary: [batch] Progressive help text
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.3 M1   Edit
Assignee: Maxime Daniel CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-29 11:29 EDT by Maxime Daniel CLA
Modified: 2008-03-20 06:35 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Implementation + amended test cases (14.52 KB, patch)
2006-05-30 09:34 EDT, Maxime Daniel CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Maxime Daniel CLA 2006-05-29 11:29:18 EDT 
3.2 RC6
The rationale is to present the result of the -help option in a more compact
manner, while giving the user a means to access more details if needed.
The suggested design is to segregate the -warn option detailed explanation and
to display it when the compiler is called with -?:warn or -help:warn.
Comment 1 Maxime Daniel CLA 2006-05-29 11:30:35 EDT 
Discussed this with Philippe today. We'd like to get this in for 3.2.1 (batch
compiler usability). I will update a patch I prepared for this a while ago.
Comment 2 Maxime Daniel CLA 2006-05-30 09:34:04 EDT 
Created attachment 42947 [details]
Implementation + amended test cases
Comment 3 Maxime Daniel CLA 2006-05-30 09:34:35 EDT 
Implemented and released in TARGET_321.
Comment 4 Frederic Fusier CLA 2006-06-12 05:21:50 EDT 
Released for 3.2.1
Released for 3.3 M1 while merging TARGET_321 in HEAD
Comment 5 Frederic Fusier CLA 2006-08-07 12:39:38 EDT 
Verified for 3.3 M1 using build I20060807-0010.
Comment 6 Frederic Fusier CLA 2006-09-12 04:14:21 EDT 
Verified for 3.2.1 using build M20060908-1655.
Comment 7 Olivier Thomann CLA 2006-10-16 12:26:22 EDT 
Revert in 3.2 maintenance due to bug 160962
Comment 8 Olivier Thomann CLA 2006-10-16 12:26:50 EDT 
So this is fixed only in the HEAD branch.
Comment 9 Maxime Daniel CLA 2008-03-20 06:35:44 EDT 
Changing the status back to VERIFIED (Frédéric and I agreed on this today).