Community
Participate
Working Groups
3.2 0425 nightly build - connect to dev.eclipse.org - retrieve the org.eclipse.swt project - in the Resource perspective: -> select the project's .classpath_win32 file, right-click -> Copy -> select the org.eclipse.swt.project, right-click -> Paste -> in the rename dialog set the value to .classpath - this compiles SWT for win32, and at the end writes the following to .log: !ENTRY org.eclipse.jdt.core 4 4 2006-04-25 11:54:39.093 !MESSAGE Background Indexer Crash Recovery !STACK 0 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException at org.eclipse.jdt.core.Signature.appendTypeSignature(Signature.java:2359) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.Signature.appendTypeSignature(Signature.java:2266) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.Signature.toCharArray(Signature.java:2245) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.search.indexing.BinaryIndexer.addBinaryAnnotation(BinaryIndexer.java:148) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.search.indexing.BinaryIndexer.indexDocument(BinaryIndexer.java:654) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.search.JavaSearchParticipant.indexDocument(JavaSearchParticipant.java:74) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.search.indexing.IndexManager.indexDocument(IndexManager.java:322) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.search.indexing.AddJarFileToIndex.execute(AddJarFileToIndex.java:197) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.search.processing.JobManager.run(JobManager.java:372) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:566)
+1 for 3.2RC2
I cannot reproduce this IAE. Note that this can only happen while reading 1.5 binary files... Do you have a JRE 1.5 as default JRE libraries? Or perhaps did you start eclipse using a 1.5 VM? If so, which one?
Good question <g>. I usually live in the linux world, so I haven't looked into this lately on my win2000 machine. Here's what java -version said: java version "1.5.0-beta" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-beta-b32c) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-beta-b32c, mixed mode) So my case is probably invalid given that this is a beta vm. I downloaded the IBM 1.5.0 from IBM's internal site and it does not show this error.
Thanks, so close as WORKSFORME