Bug 131028 - [1.5][compiler] Doubly-nested inner classes with generics fail to compile
Summary: [1.5][compiler] Doubly-nested inner classes with generics fail to compile
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2 M6   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Core-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-08 23:13 EST by Jesse Wilson CLA
Modified: 2006-03-09 17:57 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Doesn't compile under Eclipse, but compiles fine under javac (552 bytes, text/plain)
2006-03-08 23:14 EST, Jesse Wilson CLA 		no flags Details
Screenshot of Eclipse showing syntax error (137.61 KB, image/png)
2006-03-09 11:38 EST, Jesse Wilson CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Wilson CLA 2006-03-08 23:13:25 EST 
The attached file compiles under javac but fails to in Eclipse. It's a bug in the Eclipse compiler since moving the static inner class out causes the file to compile again.
Comment 1 Jesse Wilson CLA 2006-03-08 23:14:31 EST 
Created attachment 35954 [details]
Doesn't compile under Eclipse, but compiles fine under javac
Comment 2 Olivier Thomann CLA 2006-03-09 10:53:29 EST 
What is your error?
It compiles fine with the HEAD contents.
Comment 3 Olivier Thomann CLA 2006-03-09 10:53:57 EST 
Please specify your build id?
Comment 4 Jesse Wilson CLA 2006-03-09 11:38:32 EST 
Created attachment 35990 [details]
Screenshot of Eclipse showing syntax error

A screenshot showing how Eclipse highlights a syntax problem that shouldn't really be a problem.
Comment 5 Jesse Wilson CLA 2006-03-09 11:40:08 EST 
I'm on this build:
Version: 3.1.2
Build id: M20060118-1600

Perhaps I mispoke, this may only be a problem in the 'incremental compiler', I've attached a screenshot to show exactly what's going on.
Comment 6 Olivier Thomann CLA 2006-03-09 11:41:04 EST 
As I said, this is fixed in HEAD.
I'll try to reproduce with 3.1 maintenance stream.
Comment 7 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-03-09 17:49:10 EST 
This issue got resolved during 3.2m4.
Comment 8 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-03-09 17:57:38 EST 
Added GenericTypeTest#test0956.
Closing