Bug 130165 - JST doc feature inadequate for adopters
Summary: JST doc feature inadequate for adopters
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: WTP Releng
Classification: WebTools
Component: releng (show other bugs)
Version: 3.10   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 major (vote)
Target Milestone: Future   Edit
Assignee: webtools.releng CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: plan
: 111984 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-02 12:51 EST by Kate Price CLA
Modified: 2018-06-29 15:07 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kate Price CLA 2006-03-02 12:51:35 EST 
All doc plugins for the JST components are currently contained in a 2 features called org.eclipse.jst.enterprise_userdoc.feature and org.eclipse.jst.server_userdoc.feature. This does not match the way the WST doc plugins are dealt with, and doesn't provide adoptors with the option of selecting which doc plugins they want to include in their products.

I suggest the following features be created to allow adopters to select which docs they want to pull into their products (you can change the feature names to more closely match the development features if you want - I just wanted to give some suggestions of logical groupings):

org.eclipse.jst.ejb_userdoc.feature
        id="org.eclipse.jst.ejb.doc.user"

org.eclipse.jst.enterprise_userdoc.feature  (feature present - contains too many plugins)
        id="org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.doc.user"

org.eclipse.jst.server_userdoc.feature (already present)
         id="org.eclipse.jst.server.ui.doc.user"

org.eclipse.jst.ws_userdoc.feature 
         id="org.eclipse.jst.ws.axis.ui.doc.user"
         id="org.eclipse.jst.ws.consumption.ui.doc.user"
         id="org.eclipse.jst.ws.doc.user"
Comment 1 Lawrence Mandel CLA 2006-03-02 14:26:42 EST 
David, are you still working on JST features in 1.5?
Comment 2 David Williams CLA 2006-03-02 14:59:03 EST 
yes, will get back to it in week or two.
Comment 3 Lawrence Mandel CLA 2006-03-28 16:09:59 EST 
*** Bug 111984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Kate Price CLA 2006-04-20 12:52:20 EDT 
Hi David...any chance we can still get this into 1.5?
Comment 5 David Williams CLA 2006-04-20 13:00:14 EDT 
yep ... I started to say "in a week or two" 
but now see I've used that one already :) 

Ping me every couple of days and remind me how important this is to you. 

Thanks,
Comment 6 Lawrence Mandel CLA 2006-05-01 18:10:25 EDT 
David, RC2 is rapidly approaching. Any update?
Comment 7 Lawrence Mandel CLA 2006-05-11 17:09:13 EDT 
David, ping, RC2 has passed. Any update?
Comment 8 Lawrence Mandel CLA 2006-06-01 14:01:26 EDT 
As David hasn't had a chance to update this defect I'm removing the 1.5 target. This fix does not look appropriate for 1.5 at this point.
Comment 9 Kate Price CLA 2007-01-30 16:33:00 EST 
*bump*

David, can we take another look at this for WTP 2.0? I'd still like to see the feature breakdown for the doc plugins match the dev ones more closely.
Comment 10 David Williams CLA 2007-02-28 00:02:49 EST 
Yes, Kate ... let's see if we can do this for 2.0.
Comment 11 David Williams CLA 2007-06-12 10:50:11 EDT 
Hmm, how about 3.0.
Comment 12 David Williams CLA 2008-06-18 22:47:33 EDT 
we'll try again next year!
Comment 13 David Williams CLA 2011-04-14 13:12:36 EDT 
Looks like we are going to put this off for yet another release ... so marking as "future" to be explicit about that.