Bug 129983 - [1.5][assist] Need partial word for annotation autocompletion
Summary: [1.5][assist] Need partial word for annotation autocompletion
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.3 M2   Edit
Assignee: David Audel CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 107822 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-01 12:06 EST by Yen Lu CLA
Modified: 2006-09-18 10:29 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Proposed fix (24.48 KB, patch)
2006-09-06 10:43 EDT, David Audel CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Yen Lu CLA 2006-03-01 12:06:23 EST 
I grabbed Eclipse 3.2 M5a and proceeded to create a Java project with the JSR-181 reference implementation linked in. I then tried to create a Web service using an annotated Java bean. I expected that after typing "@" and pressing CTRL+SPACE, I would get some auto-completion choices but none appeared. Also, if I continuously press CTRL+SPACE to try the other default proposals, nothing appeared. auto-completion choices did not appear until I typed in a partial word. For annotations which have parameters, auto-completion just gave me the name of the annotation. e.g. if I type "@WebMethod(" and then press CTRL+SPACE, "WebMethod" is automatically added after the bracket. Shouldn't it give me choices like "operationName" and "action"?
Comment 1 Olivier Thomann CLA 2006-08-16 12:10:32 EDT 
This looks more like a feature request and therefore cannot be included in a maintenance release.
David,
Isn't this the same issue than type completion with no word?
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2006-08-28 06:56:19 EDT 
Definitely a feature request changing our existing behavior.
We are planning changes in this area for 3.3 anyway.

Nothing we would change for 3.2.1.
Comment 3 David Audel CLA 2006-09-05 04:40:08 EDT 
Now annotation arguments names are proposed even if there is no prefix (see bug 148521).
Comment 4 David Audel CLA 2006-09-06 10:43:40 EDT 
Created attachment 49489 [details]
Proposed fix

Add proposals for empty annotation name
Comment 5 David Audel CLA 2006-09-06 10:48:10 EDT 
Released for 3.3 M2.

Test added
  CompletionTests_1_5#test0290()

Annotation names are proposed just after the '@'.
Comment 6 David Audel CLA 2006-09-06 10:49:32 EDT 
*** Bug 107822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Frederic Fusier CLA 2006-09-18 10:29:52 EDT 
Verified for 3.3 M2 using build I20060918-0010