Bug 129042 - Consider using EMF load options for performance
Summary: Consider using EMF load options for performance
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: GMF-Runtime
Classification: Modeling
Component: General (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P1 major
Target Milestone: 1.0   Edit
Assignee: Chris McGee CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: investigate, performance
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-22 14:58 EST by Christian Damus CLA
Modified: 2010-07-19 12:23 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian Damus CLA 2006-02-22 14:58:29 EST 
EMF has introduced a variety of load options that are intended to boost performance.  Some of them have considerable benefits.

GMF should evaluate these load options to see which it can apply by default to its resources, without perturbing any load semantics expected by clients.

See http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=http://eclipse.org/emf/docs/performance/EMFPerformanceTips.html
for details.
Comment 1 Chris McGee CLA 2006-03-09 10:21:07 EST 
An attempt was made to evaluate these load options in the context of a large EXTLibrary model. Unfortunately, no clear results could be generated. The rest of the default GMFResource load/save options have to do with specific file format requirements, etc. having none to do with performance. Clients should decide which options they wish to use either in their resource implementation or passed to the Resource.load(Map options) call.
Comment 2 Richard Gronback CLA 2008-08-13 13:07:22 EDT 
[target cleanup] 1.0 M6 was the original target milestone for this bug
Comment 3 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2010-07-19 12:23:53 EDT 
[GMF Restructure] Bug 319140 : product GMF and component
Runtime EMF was the original product and component for this bug