Bug 116359 - Extending migration support to projectType..
Summary: Extending migration support to projectType..
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: CDT
Classification: Tools
Component: cdt-build (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.1   Edit
Assignee: Sunil Davasam CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: contributed
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-14 21:34 EST by Sunil Davasam CLA
Modified: 2008-06-19 13:27 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Patch for the enhancement (17.02 KB, patch)
2005-11-17 16:57 EST, Sunil Davasam CLA 		bjorn.freeman-benson: iplog+
Details | Diff
Patch for the enhancement (17.02 KB, patch)
2005-11-17 16:57 EST, Sunil Davasam CLA 		bjorn.freeman-benson: iplog+
Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sunil Davasam CLA 2005-11-14 21:34:41 EST 
Currently migration support is available at configuration level. I mean, if a 
particular version of tool-chain/tool/builder is not supported, tool 
integrator can provide converters for unsupported version of tool-
chain/tool/builder using 'convertToId' attribute in tool-chain definition file 
and implementing the converter interface 'IConvertManagedBuildObject'. So, if 
the user loads a project that is not supported, it will be automatically 
converted to use a new tool-chain/tool/builder version. Currently there is no 
support available if the tool integrator wants to provide a converter for 
the 'projectType'.
Comment 1 Sunil Davasam CLA 2005-11-17 16:57:05 EST 
Created attachment 30179 [details]
Patch for the enhancement
Comment 2 Sunil Davasam CLA 2005-11-17 16:57:41 EST 
Created attachment 30180 [details]
Patch for the enhancement
Comment 3 Sunil Davasam CLA 2005-11-17 17:06:06 EST 
The patch is checked into CDT and also attached to this buzilla report.
Comment 4 Doug Schaefer CLA 2006-05-20 12:57:25 EDT 
Apparently applied by Leo. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I need to know which committer applied the patch to keep the Eclipse lawyers happy :).