Description Wes Isberg 2005-11-01 05:43:00 EST

Advice not applied in subaspect using parameterized superaspect pointcut without
qualifying with type parameter.  

Declare error using same locution works.  

Doc ambiguous:  "All references to a pointcut declared in a generic type from
outside of that type must be via a parameterized type reference, and not a raw
type reference."  I get no compiler error in either case, so perhaps "outside of
that type or subtypes."  But can't interfaces can be parameterized and pointcuts
declared on interfaces?  Eek!

This was disconcerting because the declare warning showed the pointcut was
correct, but still the advice was not being applied.  (My initial aspect was a
perthis(), so I thought that was the problem.)

Not sure if this is treated by bug 112105 or any other generics bugs (is there a
tag for them?)

-------------------------------------------------------
package bugs;

public class ParameterizedTypeInPointcut {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		C.go();
	}
	static class C {
		static void go() {}
	}
}

abstract aspect AA_ParameterizedTypeInPointcut<Target> {
	pointcut going() :call(void Target.go()) ;
	before() : going() {
		System.out.println("AA.going()");
	}
}
aspect A_ParameterizedTypeInPointcut extends 
AA_ParameterizedTypeInPointcut<ParameterizedTypeInPointcut.C>{
	declare warning : going() : "going()"; // works fine
	before() : going() { // advice not applied
		System.out.println("A.going()");
	}
}