Bug 114193 - [req] Provide support for OCL
Summary: [req] Provide support for OCL
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: GMF-Tooling (ARCHIVED)
Classification: Modeling
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 1.0   Edit
Assignee: gmf.generation-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: plan
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-28 15:16 EDT by Richard Gronback CLA
Modified: 2010-07-19 22:25 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Richard Gronback CLA 2005-10-28 15:16:07 EDT 
Provide support for the Object Constraint Language for use in graphical 
definition and validation
Comment 1 Richard Gronback CLA 2005-10-30 13:36:56 EST 
This requirement was satisfied with the initial runtime contribution.
Comment 2 Dik van Leeuwen CLA 2006-11-02 07:00:08 EST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> This requirement was satisfied with the initial runtime contribution.

Can anyone tell me what version of OCL is supported, and where I can read about GMF's usage of it?
Do you support full UML2.0 OCL, or another kind of OCL?
I'm asking because I see that I can use the OCL expression "self <> oppositeEnd" in my gmfmap model (which is not defined in UML2.0), and I can NOT use the UML2.0 expression "source <> oclIsTypeOf(Call_C_Party)", i.e. it does accept the latter OCL expression but it seems to do nothing with it during execution.
Comment 3 Richard Gronback CLA 2008-08-13 13:06:46 EDT 
[target cleanup] 1.0 M5 was the original target milestone for this bug
Comment 4 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2010-07-19 22:25:19 EDT 
[GMF Restructure] Bug 319140 : product GMF and component
Definition was the original product and component for this bug