Community
Participate
Working Groups
Build 20020312 package trycatch_in; import java.net.MalformedURLException; public class TestSuperCall { static class A { public A(int i) throws MalformedURLException { } } static class B extends A { public B() { super(10); } } } In the above example the AST doesn't contain a node for the super constructor call super(10); And another question: which node will represent a this constructor call ?
Same is true for a this constructor call. Here is an example package trycatch_in; import java.net.MalformedURLException; public class TestThisConstructorCall { public TestThisConstructorCall(int i) throws MalformedURLException { } public TestThisConstructorCall() { this(10); } }
Both problems also exist if the CU is compile error free
Don't panic :-). I am looking into it. I should have an explanation soon.
I just wanted to provide useful information ;-))
The problem comes from the fact that the explicit constructor call is not part of the constructor's declaration statements. It is a specific field. It is fixed now. I will release it for next build.
Fixed and released in HEAD.
