Community
Participate
Working Groups
I don't like the name of the new type 'AnonymousClassDeclaration'. I think 'AnonymousTypeDeclaration' would be more consistent with the rest of the API.
Jim - any comment?
Where ever possible, we use standard terminology as per the Java Language Specification. In JLS 15.9.5 they are referred to as "anonymous class declarations". Besides, "type" is more general than required here - there is no such thing as an anonymous interface.
OK to close?
OK. The explanation is good.
Closed. This was not a bug.