Bug 104479 - [variables] Additional detail formatter option, show format only as label
Summary: [variables] Additional detail formatter option, show format only as label
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 137927
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Debug (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Debug-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-20 06:15 EDT by Stephen Colebourne CLA
Modified: 2008-03-31 09:32 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stephen Colebourne CLA 2005-07-20 06:15:12 EDT
Currently, the detail formatter preferences page allows detail formatters to be
used in three ways
1) Label: DetailFormatter, or Eclipse default if no DetailFormatter
   DetailPane: DetailFormatter, or toString if no DetailFormatter

2) Label: DetailFormatter, or toString if no DetailFormatter
   DetailPane: DetailFormatter, or toString if no DetailFormatter

3) Label: Eclipse default
   DetailPane: DetailFormatter, or toString if no DetailFormatter

(As you can see, it is quite difficult to express what these radio buttons do
effectively, and in fact I had to try the middle option to see what it actually
did. So there is, at least, a useability issue here...)


However, despite these options, there is no way to do what I want:
4) Label: DetailFormatter, or EclipseDefault if no DetailFormatter
   DetailPane: toString


Instead of just adding a fourth option to the dialog, I propose that the single
set of radio buttons at the bottom is broken up into two sets:
a) What to display against the label
- EclipseDefault
- toString
- DetailFormatter, or toString if no DetailFormatter
- DetailFormatter, or EclipseDefault if no DetailFormatter

b) What to display in the detail pane
- toString
- DetailFormatter, or toString if no DetailFormatter

Note, that this may affect interaction with Structure formatters and create even
more combinations, I haven't thought about that.
Comment 1 Darin Wright CLA 2005-07-29 11:02:17 EDT
Currently deferred
Comment 2 Curtis Windatt CLA 2008-03-31 09:32:08 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 137927 ***