Bug 69056

Summary:	[1.5] incorrect javadoc in ITypeBinding.isParameterizedType
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Adam Kiezun <akiezun>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	Frederic Fusier <frederic_fusier>
Status:	VERIFIED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3
Version:	3.0
Target Milestone:	3.1 M2
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows 2000
Whiteboard:

Description Adam Kiezun

2004-06-30 14:22:11 EDT

latest from 1_5 branch
 * For example, a AST type like 
 * <code>Collection&lt;String&gt;</code> typically resolves to a
 * parameterized type binding whose erasure is a type binding for the class 
 * <code>java.util.Collection</code> and whose type argument is a type
 * binding for the class <code>java.util.Collection</code>.

surely, the type argument was intended to be java.lang.String

Comment 1 Frederic Fusier

2004-07-26 12:21:59 EDT

Could you provide code example including your Javadoc comment.
Currently compiler javadoc parser is not able to understand 1.5 syntax. So, I'm
really suprised that you get any binding in a DOM/AST Javadoc hierarchy?!...

Comment 2 Adam Kiezun

2004-07-26 12:41:06 EDT

Frédéric, it's simply a typo. :)
I think the last line in the doc should be:
" * binding for the class <code>java.lang.String</code>"

unless you're referring to another report

Comment 3 Frederic Fusier

2004-07-27 04:35:37 EDT

Oooops. I was completely wrong here.
I'll fix the typo...
Thanks

Comment 4 Frederic Fusier

2004-07-27 04:40:21 EDT

Fixed and released in HEAD.

Comment 5 David Audel

2004-09-23 12:32:45 EDT

Verified in I200409230100.