Summary: | Bad feedback and bad edge position when creating an edge with border nodes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Modeling] Sirius | Reporter: | Laurent Fasani <laurent.fasani> | ||||||
Component: | Diagram | Assignee: | Project Inbox <sirius.diagram-inbox> | ||||||
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |||||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | maxime.porhel | ||||||
Version: | 2.0.5 | Keywords: | triaged | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
OS: | Windows 7 | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Laurent Fasani
2015-10-05 08:24:16 EDT
Created attachment 257036 [details]
scenario
Created attachment 257038 [details]
scenario
Implementor will have to describe a validation scenario (and attach a reproduction use case or point to existing data in the test plugins). It seems that with Sirius 2.0.x on juno 3.8.2 the source element is created on the first clic location and the target element is placed near the top left corner (the snap options have no impact) while with Sirius 3.1 on Mars.1, the target element is placed regarding the second click and the source element is placed neard the top left corner when the snap is enabled. If the snap is disabled, I retrieve the 2.0.x behavior. The feedback issue is not a regression, the feedback is broken as soos as the source and target edit parts are the same. |