Bug 408838

Summary:

[release] modeling.emf.egf 1.1

Product:

Community

Reporter:

Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton>

Component:

Proposals and Reviews

Assignee:

Eclipse Management Organization <emo>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

normal

Priority:

CC:

benoit.langlois, Ed.Merks

Version:

unspecified

Keywords:

Documentation

Target Milestone:

---

Flags:

wayne.beaton: pmc_approved+

Hardware:

OS:

All

URL:

http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.egf/reviews/1.1.0-release-review

Whiteboard:

Bug Depends on:

Bug Blocks:

393682

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Approved IP Log	none

Description Wayne Beaton

2013-05-23 12:23:01 EDT

We'll use this bug to track the EGF 1.1 release for Kepler.

Note that per Bug 393682, the Modeling project has been restructured and mid-level "container" projects (e.g. modeling.emf, modeling.emft, etc.) have been marked for termination. This project will have to be moved into the top level project. In all likelihood, very little about the project will have to change. We need to enumerate and effect those changes before this review can be declared successful.

We will move modeling.emf.egf to modeling.emf. Does this make sense?

This should have the following impact:

* Project id changes
* Project info page URL changes
* Project IP Log generator URL changes

We should change the Bugzilla product from "EMF.EGF" to just "EGF". I recommend that you ask the webmaster to create a "dummy inbox" for the project. Using a dummy inbox makes it easier for the community to follow the project.

Project website, and downloads do not need to change.

Have I missed anything?

Comment 1 Benoit Langlois

2013-05-24 05:00:18 EDT

Hello Wayne,

I think that instead of "We will move modeling.emf.egf to modeling.emf.", you mean "modeling.emf.egf to modeling.egf".
The concept of "dummy inbox" is not clear in my head but I'm going to contact the webmaster.

Benoit

Comment 2 Wayne Beaton

2013-05-24 10:47:54 EDT

(In reply to comment #1)
> I think that instead of "We will move modeling.emf.egf to modeling.emf.",
> you mean "modeling.emf.egf to modeling.egf".

Yup.

> The concept of "dummy inbox" is not clear in my head but I'm going to
> contact the webmaster.

I added some content to the Webmaster FAQ:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Webmaster_FAQ#Dummy_Inboxes

Comment 3 Wayne Beaton

2013-05-28 13:42:41 EDT

Benoit submitted the IP Log.

Comment 4 Wayne Beaton

2013-06-05 09:00:07 EDT

Created attachment 231986 [details]
Approved IP Log

Comment 5 Wayne Beaton

2013-06-06 15:49:13 EDT

PMC Approval: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/modeling-pmc/msg02842.html

Comment 6 Wayne Beaton

2013-06-17 12:08:46 EDT

I declare this review successful! Please continue with your release.

Please assemble a list of action items to complete the move of this project. There are a few projects that need to move, so let's wait until we have all/most of them ready to go before we copy the webmaster and ask him to effect the changes all at once.

Comment 7 Wayne Beaton

2013-07-11 15:24:36 EDT

(In reply to comment #6)
> Please assemble a list of action items to complete the move of this project.
> There are a few projects that need to move, so let's wait until we have all/most
> of them ready to go before we copy the webmaster and ask him to effect the
> changes all at once.

I've changed my mind. I'll leave it to the Modeling PMC's discretion to determine how to implement the moves defined by the Modeling Restructuring (Bug 393682). Since the release is complete, I'm marking this bug as FIXED.