Summary: | Add support for MSP430F5259 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Technology] RTSC (ARCHIVED) | Reporter: | Scott Gary <sg> |
Component: | Platforms | Assignee: | Scott Gary <sg> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | ademars, d-russo, dfriedland, sascha |
Version: | unspecified | Keywords: | readme |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows XP | ||
Whiteboard: | target:3.24.07, 3.25.01 |
Description
Scott Gary
2013-03-06 18:01:03 EST
fixed in gep-e74 and gep-f09 In both the g and f trees I think this entry: else if (this.$private.realDevice.match(/^MSP430F52\d+/)) { this.peripherals["interruptController"] = IC.create( {name: "interruptController", baseAddr: 0xFF80, numInterrupts: 64} ); Boot.configureDCO = true; tableEntry = "MSP430F552x"; } might need to be changed to this: else if (this.$private.realDevice.match(/^MSP430F52\d+/)) { this.peripherals["interruptController"] = IC.create( {name: "interruptController", baseAddr: 0xFF80, numInterrupts: 64} ); Boot.configureDCO = true; tableEntry = "MSP430F5259"; <---------!!!!!!! } Verify Pass I spoke with Scott Gary regarding my suggested code change. Some existing 430F52xx devices do NOT follow the 430F5259 mold. Therefore, the suggestion should NOT be followed. Consequently, I am now satisfied with the code changes. |