Bug 375920

Summary:	Eclipse is not being built anymore
Product:	[Eclipse Project] Platform	Reporter:	Krzysztof Daniel <krzysztof.daniel>
Component:	Releng	Assignee:	Platform-Releng-Inbox <platform-releng-inbox>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	blocker
Priority:	P3	CC:	daniel_megert, john.arthorne, pwebster, remy.suen, wojciech.galanciak
Version:	3.8
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Bug Depends on:	355430
Bug Blocks:

Description Krzysztof Daniel

2012-04-03 05:47:45 EDT

No fresh builds here:
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/eclipse3x.php
nor here:
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/

No new tags here:
http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.maps.git

Comment 1 Paul Webster

2012-04-03 09:25:52 EDT

we are transitioning to the eclipse.org hardware.

PW

Comment 2 Dani Megert

2012-04-03 11:37:35 EDT

(In reply to comment #1)
> we are transitioning to the eclipse.org hardware.
> 
> PW

Paul is there any ETA? Why did we stop the normal N-builds before having a working solution?

Comment 3 Paul Webster

2012-04-03 11:42:23 EDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> Paul is there any ETA? Why did we stop the normal N-builds before having a
> working solution?

We lost the normal builds when Kim left (the IBM ones).  It was either spend time fixing scripts to continue building within IBM or spend the time fixing the scripts to build on the foundation hardware.

PW

Comment 4 Dani Megert

2012-04-03 11:51:20 EDT

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > 
> > Paul is there any ETA? Why did we stop the normal N-builds before having a
> > working solution?
> 
> We lost the normal builds when Kim left (the IBM ones).  It was either spend
> time fixing scripts to continue building within IBM

But they weren't broken, were they? We could have just let them run until something really breaks and not going for I-builds.

Comment 5 Paul Webster

2012-04-03 11:56:51 EDT

(In reply to comment #4)
> But they weren't broken, were they? We could have just let them run until
> something really breaks and not going for I-builds.

They were broken as far as I know.  Kim's internal userid was deactivated, and we could no longer use her committer ID to sign or push to the foundation.

PW

Comment 6 John Arthorne

2012-04-03 11:59:53 EDT

(In reply to comment #4)
> But they weren't broken, were they? We could have just let them run until
> something really breaks and not going for I-builds.

Yes her IBM account has been deactivated. Also the physical Eclipse build lab at IBM is being dismantled this week. Our office is moving and we do not have a build lab in the new location. The plan all along was to move builds to eclipse.org and we have now run out of time.

I'm going to mark as dup of bug 355430 since that is where all relevant progress is being discussed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 355430 ***