Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | DOM/AST: node missing for super constructor call | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Dirk Baeumer <dirk_baeumer> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Olivier Thomann <Olivier_Thomann> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | akiezun |
| Version: | 2.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 2.0 M4 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 2000 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
Same is true for a this constructor call. Here is an example
package trycatch_in;
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
public class TestThisConstructorCall {
public TestThisConstructorCall(int i) throws MalformedURLException {
}
public TestThisConstructorCall() {
this(10);
}
}
Both problems also exist if the CU is compile error free Don't panic :-). I am looking into it. I should have an explanation soon. I just wanted to provide useful information ;-)) The problem comes from the fact that the explicit constructor call is not part of the constructor's declaration statements. It is a specific field. It is fixed now. I will release it for next build. Fixed and released in HEAD. |
Build 20020312 package trycatch_in; import java.net.MalformedURLException; public class TestSuperCall { static class A { public A(int i) throws MalformedURLException { } } static class B extends A { public B() { super(10); } } } In the above example the AST doesn't contain a node for the super constructor call super(10); And another question: which node will represent a this constructor call ?