View | Details | Raw Unified | Return to bug 91426 | Differences between
and this patch

Collapse All | Expand All

(-)model/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/core/builder/AbstractImageBuilder.java (-2 / +10 lines)
Lines 59-64 Link Here
59
					IMarker.CHAR_END, 
59
					IMarker.CHAR_END, 
60
					IMarker.LINE_NUMBER, 
60
					IMarker.LINE_NUMBER, 
61
					IJavaModelMarker.ARGUMENTS};
61
					IJavaModelMarker.ARGUMENTS};
62
public final static String[] JAVA_TASK_MARKER_ATTRIBUTE_NAMES = {
63
	IMarker.MESSAGE, 
64
	IMarker.PRIORITY, 
65
	IJavaModelMarker.ID, 
66
	IMarker.CHAR_START, 
67
	IMarker.CHAR_END, 
68
	IMarker.LINE_NUMBER, 
69
	IJavaModelMarker.ARGUMENTS};
62
public final static Integer S_ERROR = new Integer(IMarker.SEVERITY_ERROR);
70
public final static Integer S_ERROR = new Integer(IMarker.SEVERITY_ERROR);
63
public final static Integer S_WARNING = new Integer(IMarker.SEVERITY_WARNING);
71
public final static Integer S_WARNING = new Integer(IMarker.SEVERITY_WARNING);
64
public final static Integer P_HIGH = new Integer(IMarker.PRIORITY_HIGH);
72
public final static Integer P_HIGH = new Integer(IMarker.PRIORITY_HIGH);
Lines 434-444 Link Here
434
			else if (JavaCore.COMPILER_TASK_PRIORITY_LOW.equals(compilerPriority))
442
			else if (JavaCore.COMPILER_TASK_PRIORITY_LOW.equals(compilerPriority))
435
				priority = P_LOW;
443
				priority = P_LOW;
436
			marker.setAttributes(
444
			marker.setAttributes(
437
				JAVA_PROBLEM_MARKER_ATTRIBUTE_NAMES,
445
				JAVA_TASK_MARKER_ATTRIBUTE_NAMES,
438
				new Object[] { 
446
				new Object[] { 
439
					task.getMessage(),
447
					task.getMessage(),
440
					priority,
448
					priority,
441
					org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.util.Util.toBoolean(false),
449
					new Integer(task.getID()),
442
					new Integer(task.getSourceStart()),
450
					new Integer(task.getSourceStart()),
443
					new Integer(task.getSourceEnd() + 1),
451
					new Integer(task.getSourceEnd() + 1),
444
					new Integer(task.getSourceLineNumber()),
452
					new Integer(task.getSourceLineNumber()),

Return to bug 91426