Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:40:51 -0400
Delivered-to: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg>, <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/science-iwg>, <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

On 6/13/2016 5:51 AM, Peter Keller wrote:

For details: https://eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#GPLCOMPATIBLE

The situtation from the FSF side is explained here: <http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/using-the-gpl-for-eclipse-plug-ins>, in particular:

If you try to release a piece of software with code under both these licenses, you will end up violating one license or the other.

One other resource on this topic: https://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2010/04/06/epl-gpl-commentary/

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
@mmilinkov

References:
- [science-iwg] About java-python integration
  - From: Michele Gabusi
- Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration
  - From: Christopher Brooks
- Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration
  - From: Peter Keller

Prev by Date: Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration
Next by Date: Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration
Previous by thread: Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration
Next by thread: Re: [science-iwg] About java-python integration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs