Re: [science-iwg] Top Level Project update

[Tobias Verbeke <tobias.verbeke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

b is beautiful.

Best,
Tobias

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Torkild Ulvøy Resheim" <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Science Industry Working Group" <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 8:57:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Top Level Project update

> Yes, I also vote on B. I don’t see what good use we have in a TLP before we can
> allow LGLP prerequisites to be used in our projects. That’s the main reason we
> started this process.
> 
> Best regards,
> Torkild
>> 20. apr. 2016 kl. 20.53 skrev Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> 
>> Well, we might as well discuss it here since the cat is out of the bag. I vote
>> B.
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Andrea Ross <andrea.ross@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry everyone. I meant this for the Science SC list rather than general list.
>> My email client thought it'd help me out and auto-complete the email. <face
>> palm> Feel free to ignore.
>> 
>> Andrea
>> 
>> 
>> On 20/04/16 14:31, Andrea Ross wrote:
>> Dear Science SC,
>> 
>> We have an important decision to make related to the TLP.
>> 
>> It boils down to:
>> a) drop the LGPL prereqs, and have the TLP approved in May (next phone board
>> meeting as EF electronic voting has some quirky quorum rules that make it not a
>> good choice)
>> or
>> b) Keep the LGPL prereqs, and it'd be June or later (for the next face to face
>> board meeting) before we'd have the TLP.
>> 
>> We chatted about doing a, and coming back for b later but he cautioned against
>> that approach as it might come across the wrong way with the board.
>> 
>> My $0.02 is that we should go for b. We need it, we've already waited a while,
>> so we should push for what we really need even if it's going to take a bit
>> longer.
>> 
>> What do you think, a or b?
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Andrea
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> science-iwg mailing list
>> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jay Jay Billings
>> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
>> Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings
>> _______________________________________________
>> science-iwg mailing list
>> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg