Re: [science-iwg] science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20

[UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, but as mentioned there should be a Science TLP to complement this WG soon, so that means, if approved future project proposals like https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.january

may look along the lines of

https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/science.january (hypothetical URL;-)

Would any project like January, BioClipse or others have the option to switch like we saw e.g. Mylyn and others did from Technology to Tools, Runtime etc.?

Mylyn from what I remember never changed the URL (except maybe when it was renamed from "Mylar") so it seems likely existing projects may change a TLP without changing or losing the project URL. That's among STEM's desires to keep, otherwise especially visibility in the scientific world would be welcome by the STEM project.

Though the project lead at IBM is based in the US, there are several key committers in Berlin, so should it be of interest to meet with Mike while he's likely in town next month, Matthias and others at BfR (see http://wiki.eclipse.org/The_STEM_Development_Team) would be happy to have a chat if there's time.

Werner

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:05 AM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
        science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (UOMo)
   2. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (Mike Milinkovich)
   3. Re: science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20 (Jay Jay Billings)
   4. Re: EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows & more
      (Jay Jay Billings)
   5. Re: EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows & more (Andrea Ross)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:28:49 +0200
From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
Message-ID:
        <CAAGawe2z-8tPHSfRLFem9Fyj4pZQnD9=rJpKZfe4VbdodaNoLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,

That would be good to know. I only plan to attend Unconference day (as none
of the 2 sessions related to Automotive myself and another colleague from
the same team proposed are in the main conference program and May also has
a tremendous amount of holidays in Germany, so losing a whole week in June
would not be good either) but at least the Automotive WG F2F on that day is
also of interest to me. If there are agenda proposals for Science, I'd be
happy to say something about STEM given its new release in June and a
prospect of moving closer to Science especially if the IWG was to turn into
a full top level project like "Tools" or "Technology".

Cheers,
Werner

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:00 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
>         science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows & more
>       (Christian Pontesegger)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:11:23 +0200
> From: Christian Pontesegger <christian.pontesegger@xxxxxx>
> To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [science-iwg] EclipseCon France - Workflows, workflows &
>         more
> Message-ID: <5715072B.4080108@xxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> Hi all,
>
> plans regarding the unconference would be great. Is there already a
> timeslot assigned for the friday session? Would be great to know for
> travel planning.
>
> cheers
> Christian
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
>
> End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20160419/d261e5e6/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:01:40 -0400
From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] science-iwg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
Message-ID: <57166474.5030504@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

On 4/19/2016 12:28 PM, UOMo wrote:
> ...especially if the IWG was to turn into a full top level project
> like "Tools" or "Technology".

It is not correct to think of this as the IWG turning into a top-level
project. A WG and a TLP are complementary.

The charter for the Science Top-Level Project will hopefully be approved
by the Eclipse Foundation Board of Directors on tomorrow's conference call.

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
@mmilinkov