| Re: [science-iwg] [EXTERNAL] Re: Science Fall Release |
I would like for this release to get us doing releases in the Eclipse Way and then for us to take place in the Oxygen Simultaneous Release next June. There's no need for us to maintain our own release chain once we learn how it works and can sync up with the rest of the community.
Jay
Same for me.
If a code name would be too tricky, we could also consider the frequency of planned releases.
If it's just one release per year, maybe just mention the year as in "Eclipse Science 2016" etc?
Not very original, but easy.
erwin
Op 05/04/2016 om 08:34 schreef Jonah Graham:
On 4 April 2016 at 17:41, Friedman-Hill, Ernest <ejfried@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To open yet another can of worms: its always awkward and confusing when a “QN" release ends up coming out in QN+1 . A code name is a way to avoid this; I’d like to see “Q3 Release” jettisoned ASAP.
+1 on ditching Q3 name, not least of all because our current target date in October is already Q4 :-)
_______________________________________________ science-iwg mailing list science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg