Re: [science-iwg] Apache Commons Math 3 and similar cases

[UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Philip,

Were they untampered exactly as the JAR files in MavenCentral?

http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.commons%7Ccommons-math3%7C3.5%7Cjar

The mentioned JAR already contains all necessary OSGi information, so if the IP concern was sorted out, that should be OK. It wouldn't be OK to rip something out, Apache simply doesn't allow it, nor would e.g. Eclipse like a JAR file that's missing a core class or bundle making it incompatible?;-)

Cheers,

Werner

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:00 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
        science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Apache Commons Math 3 and similar cases (UOMo)
   2. Re: Apache Commons Math 3 and similar cases (Philip Wenig)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:54:26 +0200
From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [science-iwg] Apache Commons Math 3 and similar cases
Message-ID:
        <CAAGawe3ca2ufbJH7pKR0A9nyX8ix=Se=tErb+sr5pyvo5_podA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Dear All,

Last week beside my own talk about standards and data quality at Apache Big
Data / ApacheCon Core Europe I took part in discussions at Apache BarCamp
Europe, too.

A topic discussed was "Small Reusable Components". To find out, if there
was a smaller set of libraries for components that are found useful to more
than one project. At the moment it is mostly Commons. And several
participants mentioned cases similar to the issue Eclipse IP team feels
present in Commons Math 3.

Members of the Apache Board and similar administrative bodies at Apache
Foundation made very clear in the BarCamp, that should a single class be
missing or different from an official release, the artifact must no longer
be called "Apache Commons Math" or similar.

The "com.springsource..." clones of widely used open source projects would
be a good example of how to do it if all else fails. Should Philip not find
a solution with Eclipse IP to get Apache Commons Math 3 entirely unchanged
(not sure about the OSGi Manifest where missing, but looking at those
Spring bundles it seems even that might be a breach of original artifact)
into Orbit, the only legal way would be adding it under something like
"com.lablicate.apache.commons.math3".

Kind Regards,

Werner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20151006/d0fbb295/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:58:37 +0200
From: Philip Wenig <philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Apache Commons Math 3 and similar cases
Message-ID: <5613EFAD.4080401@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"

Werner,

libraries are published OSGi ready in Orbit. The purpose is an easy
consuming in Eclipse projects. No renaming. Nothing else.


Philip

Am 06.10.2015 um 09:54 schrieb UOMo:
> Dear All,
>
> Last week beside my own talk about standards and data quality at
> Apache Big Data / ApacheCon Core Europe I took part in discussions at
> Apache BarCamp Europe, too.
>
> A topic discussed was "Small Reusable Components". To find out, if
> there was a smaller set of libraries for components that are found
> useful to more than one project. At the moment it is mostly Commons.
> And several participants mentioned cases similar to the issue Eclipse
> IP team feels present in Commons Math 3.
>
> Members of the Apache Board and similar administrative bodies at
> Apache Foundation made very clear in the BarCamp, that should a single
> class be missing or different from an official release, the artifact
> must no longer be called "Apache Commons Math" or similar.
>
> The "com.springsource..." clones of widely used open source projects
> would be a good example of how to do it if all else fails. Should
> Philip not find a solution with Eclipse IP to get Apache Commons Math
> 3 entirely unchanged (not sure about the OSGi Manifest where missing,
> but looking at those Spring bundles it seems even that might be a
> breach of original artifact) into Orbit, the only legal way would be
> adding it under something like "com.lablicate.apache.commons.math3".
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OpenChrom - the open source alternative for chromatography / mass spectrometry
Dr. Philip Wenig ? Founder ? philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ? http://www.openchrom.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20151006/5c296981/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 3
******************************************