Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] Gemini-blueprint: Need help reviving the project

s/Eclipse Foundation/Eclipse Development Process/

There is no such requirement. There used to be a requirement to include *all* bits in a release, but that was relaxed some time ago (I can't find quite the right bug that tracks this, but Bug 330729 [1] comes close). Virgo, for example, has made distinct "runtime" and "tools" releases.


Wayne

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=330729#c2

On 11/08/16 09:57 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On 11 Aug 2016, at 15:33, Thomas Watson wrote:

I think this is an unfortunate consequence of how the Eclipse Foundation
defines projects and releases.  Apache projects are not required to
release this way.  For example the Apache Felix and Apache Aries projects
can release each of their bundles separately without a coordinated effort
across the complete project to release all their bundles "at once".

If you can point me to where in Eclipse process this requirement is stated
I'll gladly help fix it.

/max

Tom

From:   Mike Keith <michael.keith@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:     Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   08/11/2016 08:13 AM
Subject:        Re: [rt-pmc] Gemini-blueprint: Need help reviving the
project
Sent by:        rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, this was the primary reason why we were initially structured as
subprojects under a parent project. As long as there are no common
committers across all of the subprojects I think it would be hard to
coordinate a common release. It would not be impossible (Eclipse does it
but it takes a lot of process and overhead) but it wouldn't be fun,
convenient to any of the subprojects, or useful to the consumers since
nobody uses them all.

Thanks,
-Mike

On Aug 11, 2016, at 5:24 AM, Olaf <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear all,

It also has some disadvantages, i.e. all must release together

I was not aware of this constraint – my understanding was that we treat
them as one from an administrative point of view, not as code.
Indeed, the projects are completely independent and releasing them
together would not make any sense at all.

Regards,
Olaf

From: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gunnar Wagenknecht
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 09:53
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Gemini-blueprint: Need help reviving the project

Hi Mike,

Rolling all sub-projects into one has some benefits, mostly less structure
and thus less administration effort. It also has some disadvantages, i.e.
all must release together. IMHO, having a project and sub-project
structure makes sense if there is some common management across all
projects. However, I think this is not the case. Each project is mostly
independent. Is that the case?

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/

On 10 Aug 2016, at 21:55, Michael Keith <MICHAEL.KEITH@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As the leader of the Gemini project I guess I should chime in…

Gemini already is a single project, with 6 subprojects. Given that each of
the subprojects is quite different from the others the hypothesis was that
nobody would want to consume all of them, and in fact, this has proven
itself to be true in that never has anyone contributed or expressed an
interest in all 6. This makes me think that nobody would want to lead all
6, much less maintain them.

However, Gemini has been wallowing for a few years, since I became engaged
in a completely different product line, and if somebody wants to take it
on I would be more than happy to pass the baton. I asked internally to see
if there was any interest in taking on Gemini JPA, the subproject that I
also lead, but did not get any nibbles at that time. Since then I have
been keeping up with the very infrequent forum posts, but the project has
been on life support for awhile.

-Mike

On Aug 9, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

sure, if there is a pool of committers to bring in, sounds like this
component is suffering in general

+1 for rolling it all into one project if it isn't, that would at least
bring the component into other active committers domain

http://git.eclipse.org/c/?q=gemini

looks like rollup might be tough as well, it looks like it is suffering
from lack of activity overall

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
I'm not sure this is a technology issue (GitHub vs. Gerrit). It sounds
more like a resource/staffing issue.

FWIW, it's pretty easy to reboot a project at Eclipse. We just need proof
that it's dysfunctional and we as PMC can replace/bring in new committers.
I don't think GitHub can do this to any project hosted there.

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/

On 09 Aug 2016, at 21:01, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Would it be better to attic the project here and let someone fork it to
github where it is more likely to pick up more general interest?  I don't
know that the overheard of an Eclipse project is desirable when trying to
build a community up from scratch.

Or is gemini itself doing fine and it is just a singular component having
issues, if that is the case then rolling it into another component would
likely be a better option?

just a thought..
Jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Hi All,

I just returned from vacation. Has the discussion been progressed? If the
gemini-blueprint project is unresponsive we should talk to Olaf if he is
interested in bringing it forward and being added as a committer.

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/

On 02 Aug 2016, at 09:58, Olaf <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear RT-PMC,

I am a contributor to the gemini-blueprint project. Since the 2.0.0
release in March, I am in need of further assistance by the project lead’s
to consolidate some general project issues. However, the lead seems to
lack resources as I was unable to get feedback since then.

I would appreciate if the PMC could clarify whether re-election of project
leadership for gemini-blueprint is required to get things moving again.

Kind regards,
Olaf

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation

Back to the top