|
Hi Marcel and the others,
sorry for missing the committers vote. I had noticed the mails,
but forgot to act over Christmas.
I would very much like to remain a committer to the project.
However, I plan to do my BA electives this summer and therefore
should not have enough spare time for a another full-scale project
next semester. Since there probably won't be many bug/change
requests on my old code, I would understand if my status was
(temporarily) revoked due to inactivity.
Best,
Stefan
On 12/28/2012 10:08 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Recommenders-dev,
thanks for your response and thanks for the time you spent on the
project, Sebastian. I'm sad to hear that you won't find the time
to continue working on this project. Given your past records, I'd
like propose to change your state to "Committer Emeritus" - if you
like and no one else has objections.
Given the results of the last poll, it seems that a
reactivation of the old committers - or a cleanup - is needed to
continue the project. When committer elections fail due to not
participating (not voting at all - not giving "0") this is not
good. It may be because of Christmas but I think it's not the
cause why the election failed. I'd like to detail a little bit
about the status of every current committer. A copy of this
mail goes to all committer's email address directly to make
sure they receive it.
Andreas Kaluza was one of the initial committers for the
project and student working with Johannes, Stefan and me on the
Code Recommenders project in 2010. Unfortunately he never found
the time to commit code to the project after his initial version
of call chain completion. Andreas, can you briefly respond to
this email?
Stefan Henss is as master student at Darmstadt University of
Technology and currently heading for another project/master
thesis. It seems he's not listening to the list anymore. Stefan,
are you interested to keep the committer status?
Johannes Lerch worked a lot on the Code Recommenders
project in 2011 but his research area shifted last year
towards security mining. Johannes, do you want to keep
committer status - and help to project to evolve (at least by
responding to committer votes in
recommenders/recommenders.incubator and and architectural
questions)?
Chen Cheng was a GSOC student on who worked on Snipmatch
and who quickly after the final evaluation disappeared. I
assume that his committer rights can be revoked safely even
after this short period. Chen, let me know when I'm wrong by
responding to this email.
Doug Wightman. Doug, you and your students contributed
Snipmatch some time ago (is it a year ago already?). Committer
status also requires some level of participation such as
participating in committer elections and helping the project
to grow. Can you explain what your plans look like with
Snipmatch and your committer status?
The last poll results show that we cannot continue with
such a long list of passive committers. Please respond to this
email and let us know how to continue.
Thanks,
Marcel
Hey Marcel,
I was not very active in the last year, teaching at the
university
took its toll. :(
Read-only access to the repository is all I need to
continue my
current work, feel free to revoke my committer rights.
Thank you for the opportunity to get insights in such an
innovative project.
best regards
Sebastian
2012/12/21 Marcel Bruch <marcel.bruch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
It's time for the annual committer
list cleanup. If you are a committer of Recommenders
being listed as inactive in [1], please let me know (by
responding to this note) that you'd like to remain a
committer on Code Recommenders or Code Recommenders
Incubator.
Thanks,
Marcel
_______________________________________________
recommenders-dev mailing list
recommenders-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/recommenders-dev
|
