I'm dumbfounded. I can't fathom why Dani, Matthias, and Martin are
not already on the AC.
Alexander was nominated and received overwhelming support for
appointment, but it looks like the last bit of follow up never
happened. I've given that a kick.
Pascal has previously been on the AC as a member company
representative, and I swear that we had started the nomination
process for him to be appointed last year, but don't see it in the
archive.
Max is listed as a mentor for Andmore. This oversight is completely
my fault; normally I check this sort of thing, but must have just
assumed he was a member. So I'll add him to my "I'm dumbfounded"
list.
It's high-time to nominate Lars as well.
If there is no objection, I'd like to nominate you all for
appointment to the AC.
Appointment to the AC is a recognition that you've been a pretty big
deal to the Eclipse Community. In practical terms, this will put you
the AC mailing list and invite you to join the monthly calls. This
will also give you the ability to volunteer to mentor new projects,
though there is no specific requirement to do so.
If you'd rather not join the AC, please let me know either via this
list or private email before May 14.
The nomination process starts by bringing up the nomination on the
call. If there is consensus, we initiate a public discussion on the
mailing list; the the results of that public discussion are sent to
Mike with a recommendation to appoint. I'm pretty sure that he's
equally dumbfounded that you're not all already members.
Wayne
On 04/05/15 03:16 AM, Sohn, Matthias
wrote:
+1 for retirement, I am also not a member of the AC
+1 for the retirement. I'm also not part of the
AC
Am 04.05.2015 9:01 vorm. schrieb
"Daniel Megert" < daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Wayne
> Everybody that is actively participating in
this group is either on the AC or should be.
Wayne, I'm not.
Dani
From:
Wayne
Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
01.05.2015
21:29
Subject:
Re:
[platform-vision] Platform Vision meeting, April
22/2015
Sent
by: platform-vision-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm thinking that the need for the
Platform Vision group to meet on a bi-weekly basis has
passed.
I believe that everything that we've been talking
about lately is appropriate for a more general
audience, e.g. the Architecture Council.
Everybody that is actively participating in this group
is either on the AC or should be.
Is there any objection to suspending our biweekly call
in favour of adding content to the monthly AC call?
Wayne
On 21/04/15 11:52 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
We have a call scheduled for tomorrow at
11 AM EDT.
--
Phone numbers
North America 1-866-569-4992
Germany 49-692-2224-6059
France 33-(0)-17-070-8535
UK 0800-033-7806
Switzerland 41-44-580-2115
Sweden 46-85-063-8386
Italy 003-902-3604-8268
Then enter the participant conference extension: 430,
then enter pin 4718
Alternatively, SIP clients can call 430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, then enter pin 4718
--
The Eclipse Foundation has engaged with UX experts to
review the initial user experience with Eclipse. This
includes the website, download, and installation
process. Ideally, we'd like to look at the Welcome
page as well, but I'm pretty sure that we don't have
the resources right now to actually implement any
changes.
Pascal is working on code changes and tests to various
parts of Eclipse (p2, launcher, tycho) including
changing the Mac layout and packaging as a .dmg file.
It would be great if Pascal can elaborate on the call.
We've the UX experts on the Oomph Installer. Eike
and--with help from Yatta--put some serious UX work
into the installer. Eike presented it to the UX folks
last week. I am concerned that some of the the project
descriptions (e.g. targets) in the Oomph repository
have gotten stale. Keeping these up to date is a
challenge that we (collectively) need to address.
The "profiles" work that we've been investigating is
an extension to the Oomph notion of packages and
configurations. A profile is a higher level concept
that combines the package definition with the
workspace configuration. The idea is to make it
possible for users to snapshot and share their
profiles. This also includes the ability to capture
and share preferences. I'm not happy with the term
"profile" as it suggests personal information (e.g.
Facebook profile), but we haven't come up with an
alternative. We've decided to defer profiles, as there
just isn't enough time for Mars.
Buildship (Gradle) CQs have been created and we have
code. The Planning Council has rejected their
inclusion in Mars. We've engaged to Tools PMC to
attempt an appeal. Any ideas you might have are
welcome.
I'd like to talk a bit about the composition of the
"Eclipse Project" Marketplace.
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
[attachment
"atth36ns.png" deleted by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM]
[attachment "eclipsecon-100x100-roundgoing.png"
deleted by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM]
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
|