Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [pdt-dev] Target platform questions

All 3 suggestions sounds good to me too.

Kaloyan

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Michał Niewrzał <michal.n@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
All ideas sounds good to me.

Michal

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:34 PM, thierry blind <thierryblind@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes it's probably time to update my installations (and to drop support for older releases) ;)


Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:24:59 +0200
From: zulus@xxxxxxxxx
To: pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Target platform questions


Hi Thierry,

Updating eclipse is relatively easy, so I hope you can update in 30mins.

Anyway, it depends on which api we will use. For example IAdatapter#getAdapter(Class):Object was updated in Mars to IAdapater#getAdapter(Class<T>):T.

-- 
Dawid Pakuła
+48 795 996 064

On 30 September 2015 at 22:14:44, thierry blind (thierryblind@xxxxxxx) wrote:

Hi Dawid,
totally agree with 1. and 3. :)

For 2., I'm still using Luna SR1 on some computers, with latest PDT snapshots, so this means there will be no more backward compatibility/support in the future?

I will be quite busy until beginning november, so sorry if I will not be very available next months!

Thierry.


Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:25:16 +0200
From: zulus@xxxxxxxxx
To: pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pdt-dev] Target platform questions

Hi Team,

I have two problems for today, both related to target platform.

1. Currently we checking our builds with luna and mars repo. I have proposition to start build with mars (base) and neon (next).  Are you agree?

2. Independently from base repository, we currently trying to keep api compatibility with eclipse 3.8. Because I would like to start using Mars api (IAdapter generics, parallel jobs, e4) I have a proposition to introduce update api base line policy: Update api base line after each "*.1"  release. What you think?

3. Last problem is BREE version, now set to 1.6. Mars targets it to 1.7 (EOL). I would like to update also in PDT and introduce policy to keep min. java in sync with platform. Again, what you think?

-- 
Dawid Pakuła

_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev

_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev

_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev


_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev


Back to the top