Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno

From: Jacek Pospychała <jacek.p@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:55:07 +0100
Delivered-to: pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/pdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev>, <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/pdt-dev>, <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Interesting!
Do you have any examples what feels faster? (and you compared to 3.8 or 4.2?)
It seems that Eclipse platform 4.3 (Kepler) dev builds were improved a
lot in terms of GUI performance. On PDT side we didn't touch lately
anything performance-related.

Jacek


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Robert Gründler <r.gruendler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> thanks Alexey, i got it working now.
>
> fyi: I don't know if it's the changes in Kepler / DLTK or PDT itself, but
> PDT seems a lot faster running the latest versions under kepler. Great job!
>
>
> regards
>
> -robert
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Alexey Panchenko <alex.panchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You need nightly build of DLTK, at the moment available only from
>> https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/dltk-nightly/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Robert Gründler <r.gruendler@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright thanks.
>>>
>>> I've tried the Kepler build now, and it seems contentassist is broken
>>> (stack trace at the end of the mail).
>>>
>>> Do i need to upgrade to a specific DLTK version too? Right now the
>>> following has been installed during dependency resolution:
>>>
>>>       Dynamic Languages Toolkit - Core Frameworks    4.0.0.201206120848
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.core.feature.group    Eclipse.org
>>>
>>>
>>> If you think it's a regression, i can file a bug in bugzilla.
>>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> -robert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's the trace:
>>>
>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ScriptCompletionProposal.setProposalInfo(Lorg/eclipse/dltk/ui/text/completion/ICompletionProposalInfo;)V
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.php.internal.ui.editor.contentassist.PHPCompletionProposalCollector.createTypeProposal(PHPCompletionProposalCollector.java:291)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.php.internal.ui.editor.contentassist.PHPCompletionProposalCollector.createScriptCompletionProposal(PHPCompletionProposalCollector.java:119)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ScriptCompletionProposalCollector.processUnprocessedProposal(ScriptCompletionProposalCollector.java:315)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ScriptCompletionProposalCollector.processUnprocessedProposals(ScriptCompletionProposalCollector.java:291)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ScriptCompletionProposalCollector.getScriptCompletionProposals(ScriptCompletionProposalCollector.java:273)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ScriptCompletionProposalComputer.computeScriptCompletionProposals(ScriptCompletionProposalComputer.java:219)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ScriptCompletionProposalComputer.computeCompletionProposals(ScriptCompletionProposalComputer.java:266)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.CompletionProposalComputerDescriptor.computeCompletionProposals(CompletionProposalComputerDescriptor.java:346)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.CompletionProposalCategory.computeCompletionProposals(CompletionProposalCategory.java:276)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ContentAssistProcessor.collectProposals(ContentAssistProcessor.java:291)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.completion.ContentAssistProcessor.computeCompletionProposals(ContentAssistProcessor.java:247)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.wst.sse.ui.internal.contentassist.CompoundContentAssistProcessor.computeCompletionProposals(CompoundContentAssistProcessor.java:127)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.ContentAssistant.computeCompletionProposals(ContentAssistant.java:1839)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup.computeProposals(CompletionProposalPopup.java:566)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup.access$16(CompletionProposalPopup.java:563)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup$2.run(CompletionProposalPopup.java:498)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:70)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.CompletionProposalPopup.showProposals(CompletionProposalPopup.java:492)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.ContentAssistant$2.run(ContentAssistant.java:378)
>>>     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:135)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:3965)
>>>     at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3642)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.swt.PartRenderingEngine$9.run(PartRenderingEngine.java:1049)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:332)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.swt.PartRenderingEngine.run(PartRenderingEngine.java:939)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.E4Workbench.createAndRunUI(E4Workbench.java:79)
>>>     at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$5.run(Workbench.java:587)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:332)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:542)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:124)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:196)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:110)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:79)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:353)
>>>     at
>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:180)
>>>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>     at
>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>>     at
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>>     at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:629)
>>>     at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:584)
>>>     at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1443)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jacek Pospychała <jacek.p@xxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's correct one. Version numbers haven't been updated yet. They
>>>> should be shortly...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Robert Gründler <r.gruendler@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Using http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/updates/3.2-nightly/ gives
>>>> > me
>>>> > the following pdt version
>>>> >
>>>> >     PHP Development Tools (PDT)    3.1.2.201212311412
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Is this the correct one? I would have thought it should be 3.2.xxx
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > regards
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > -robert
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Robert Gründler
>>>> > <r.gruendler@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> thanks for the info Jacek and happy new year ;)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -robert
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jacek Pospychała <jacek.p@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> hi,
>>>> >>> I just created branch for PDT maintenance builds for Juno SR2
>>>> >>> release.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So if you're using Juno, please use p2 repository:
>>>> >>>  http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/updates/3.1-nightly/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If you're using Kepler developer builds, please use p2 repository:
>>>> >>>  http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/updates/3.2-nightly/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Previously I was hoping that it'd be possible to have just a single
>>>> >>> repository that works for everyone. Unfortunately it doesn't work,
>>>> >>> because other projects that we depend on grow quickly and become
>>>> >>> backward incompatible.
>>>> >>> The repository url that we used until now
>>>> >>> (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/updates/nightly/) will point
>>>> >>> to
>>>> >>> the Juno builds.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> so please update your urls!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> thanks!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Jacek
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> pdt-dev mailing list
>>>> >>> pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > pdt-dev mailing list
>>>> > pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pdt-dev mailing list
>>>> pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pdt-dev mailing list
>>> pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pdt-dev mailing list
>> pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdt-dev mailing list
> pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Robert Gründler

References:
- [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Jacek Pospychała
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Robert Gründler
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Robert Gründler
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Jacek Pospychała
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Robert Gründler
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Alexey Panchenko
- Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
  - From: Robert Gründler

Prev by Date: Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
Next by Date: Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
Previous by thread: Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
Next by thread: Re: [pdt-dev] Separate builds for Kepler and Juno
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs